“How do we scale up these voluntary alternatives while avoiding fines and imprisonment?”
-
Transit: Slugging, ride-sharing with donations
-
Alcohol: home brewing barter networks
-
Energy: community production and sharing plans (biogas, electricity)
-
Education: homeschooling networks and legal defense associations
-
Policing: private investigators, block watch groups (or apps like Buoy), private security services
-
Create the alternative, and get it operating in the legal grey zone.
-
Demonstrate to the governing body that the alternative service meets the safety requirements of the statute/regulations.
-
Ask the governing body to opt out of the government service, be exempted from the licensing scheme, and/or receive a tax credit for value of government services no longer used.
-
When these requests are rejected, make it a political issue and lobby for legislative change to allow for opting out.
Let’s not kid ourselves, this is a massive amount of work. One of the biggest hurdles is convincing people that it could be in their best interests to give up tax-funded services in favour of self-funded ones.
This is where choosing our battles becomes very important—we need to focus on areas that are both important to people, and where we can demonstrate that the government delivered services are performing poorly compared to voluntary ones. Taxis vs. Uber is a perfect example. People travel to nearly any other major city in North America and they can experience this alternative. Auto insurance is another—people only need to go to Alberta to see a market based system that offers more choice and lower prices. There’s already enough popular support (over 50% of voters) for allowing ride-sharing and removing ICBC’s monopoly on auto liability insurance, there just needs to be a coordinated lobbying effort to get the legislation passed to make it happen.
Alternately, you choose an area that is perceived as low risk and under municipal jurisdiction, such as maintenance of public parks. Let’s say you formed a residents association for your neighbourhood and started volunteering your time picking up trash at your local park. If you found a few of your neighbours to join you in this, you could scale it up to doing grounds-keeping, starting with work the city currently isn’t doing.
Once you’ve demonstrated to the residents that you’re able to provide a level of service comparable to that of the city, do some research find out or estimate how much it costs the city to maintain the public areas in your neighbourhood. Divide that amount by the number of households in the neighbourhood to come up with the per-household cost. Then put together an estimate of what it would cost to do the maintenance with volunteer labour. With this info, you could then survey your neighbours and ask them if they’d be willing to volunteer their time and make voluntary contribution of money to maintain the public areas if this would entitle them to a deduction on their property taxes.
If the survey results show enough buy-in, you could start negotiating with the city to opt out of their grounds-keeping services in exchange for a tax break for all property owners in the neighbourhood. But it isn’t just about paying less tax, it’s also about letting individuals and local communities determine what services they want and how they’ll be delivered.